Continuing Resolution Negotiations Stall as September 30 Deadline Draws Nearer - Take Action!
The U.S. House of Representatives and Senate returned to session for the first time since August recess, but neither chamber reported progress towards an agreement on a continuing resolution (CR) to keep the federal government funded after the new fiscal year on October 1. Lawmakers have until September 30 – the end of fiscal year (FY) 2022 – to enact a CR, or risk a partial government shutdown. Government shutdowns or long-term CRs have serious consequences for HUD’s and USDA’s affordable housing, homelessness, and community development programs. CRs maintain the level of funding provided by Congress for the previous fiscal year. Because the costs of housing and development programs are tied to market rates, which have spiked dramatically since FY22, flat funding acts as a cut and reduces the number of people served.
While appropriations leaders in the House and Senate are looking to pass a CR that will last until mid-December, they have yet to settle on a date – either December 9 or December 16 appears likely – and need to agree on what, if any, policies to include in the must-pass legislation. With only seven legislative days left in which both chambers will be in session before the FY22 spending bill expires, time is quickly running out for lawmakers to reach an agreement on the CR. Advocates should contact their members of Congress and urge them to pass a CR as soon as possible to keep the government funded and avoid the potentially disastrous consequences of a partial government shutdown. Once a CR is passed, appropriations leaders will still need to reach an agreement on an appropriations bill for FY23. The House bill for Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development (THUD) would provide roughly $3 billion more for HUD’s vital affordable housing, homelessness, and community development programs than the Senate’s proposal.
American Families Plan
american_families_plan_4-28-21.pdf The President spoke to a joint session of Congress where he focused on many of the big picture items he seeks to accomplish this year. A central piece of this is his “American Families Plan,” which includes things like universal preschool; two years of free community college; federal support for child care; national paid family and medical leave and more. This would be accompanied by both tax cuts and tax increases. In the latter category, high-income earners and increased enforcement are central focuses, however, there are a number of other tax provisions of specific concern to the apartment industry, including:
Individual Tax Rates: increase to 39.6% the top tax rate for ordinary income.
Capital Gains: increase the rate to 39.6% for those making over $1 million.
1031 Like-kind Exchanges: limit the tax deferral amount to $500,000.
Estate Tax: eliminate stepped-up basis for gains over $1 million ($2.5 million per couple) and tax the gains if the property is not donated to charity. Family-owned businesses would receive some protection if the heirs to the business continue to operate it.
Carried Interest: tax as ordinary income.
Pass-thru Loss Deductibility: make permanent section 461(l) that restricts the deductibility of active pass-through business losses to $250K/$500K.
These are some of the highest impact provisions for real estate, but there are others. One piece of good news: the 20% deduction for pass-through business income created under section 199A in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was untouched by this proposal. NAA is working with our colleagues in real estate to analyze this plan and plot out our advocacy strategy going forward. At this level of tax increase, it seems unlikely that any bipartisan compromise will be reached and thus budget reconciliation will have to be the method by which this package, in whatever form it takes, is passed. That means moderate Democrats in the Senate and House will be critical to our efforts. There are already signs that the Democratic caucus is not entirely in lock-step over these proposals so this may be the most extreme point from which the negotiations move back. It will be very important for NAA members to share with us the impacts of these proposals so that we can communicate this to Capitol Hill. Stay tuned for more on that.
